The Soldier’s Dilemma, Brutus, and Julius Caesar (for Global I)

During the Vietnam War, an infantry squad was patrolling deep in enemy-controlled territory near the Cambodian border. At one point in this operation, the squad leader, Sergeant Johnson, decided to scout along a trail that ran through a valley leading toward a village a short distance away. Johnson told one of his rifleman, a private named Dillon, to stay on a small hilltop as a lookout while the rest of the squad followed along the trail in the valley below. Johnson expressed concern about a possible ambush on the trail and reminded Dillon that their platoon had been ambushed in this same area and had suffered a number of casualties some weeks prior to the present operation. “Don’t take any chances,” Johnson warned. “Better to kill a few of those murdering villagers than to let any more Americans die.”

As Dillon watched the squad make its way along the trail, he saw a Vietnamese woman suddenly appear on the trail just ahead of the squad, but around the bend so they could not see her. From his vantage point, the woman appeared to lean over the edge of the trail and then quickly moved back into the underbrush—out of sight of the squad, but still visible to Dillon.

Dillon was immediately suspicious. This was enemy controlled territory, and the woman could easily be part of the local guerilla forces. On the other hand, many innocent peasants lived in and around the village. Was the woman a guerrilla soldier who might set off a mine or booby trap when thee squad came around the bend in the trail? Or was the woman simply a peasant who had perhaps dropped something on the trail in her haste to hide from the advancing American soldiers? Also, what about the things Johnson had told him? As a soldier, he was taught to obey all orders of his superiors. To disobey is a crime.

As these thoughts went through Dillon’s mind, the squad kept moving and now was almost at the spot where the woman was hiding. The squad was too far away for Dillon to call out to them. Even a warning shot would probably not stop them from proceeding around the bend. Dillon raised his rifle and lined up his sights on the woman in the brush. But as his finger tightened on the trigger, he hesitated.

If he shot the woman and there turned out not to be a mine or booby trap on the trail, he would have murdered an innocent person. But if he didn’t shoot her, a number of his friends might be blown to bits if the woman detonated a mine.
Small Group Questions
1. What should Dillon do: hold his fire or shoot the woman?
2. Why is that the right thing for him to do?
3. Do you agree with what Sergeant Johnson told Dillon? Why or why not?
Whole Class Discussion Questions
1. If Dillon holds his fire, why does the fact that the people in his squad are his “friends” make a difference (or does that make a difference)?
2. If Dillon decides to shoot the woman and it turns out that she was just an innocent peasant woman, do you think he has done anything wrong? Why or why not?
3. If Dillon killed an innocent civilian would you be willing to call him a murderer? Why or why not? If yes, what should his punishment be? Why?
4. If Dillon decides not to shoot the woman, and it turns out that she was a guerilla soldier who sets off a mine or a booby trap, and some of his fellow soldiers are killed and wounded, do you think he has done anything wrong? Why or why not?
5. If Dillon fails to shoot the woman and some of his fellow soldiers are killed and wounded as a result of his failure to shoot, would you be willing to say that he has committed a crime? Why or why not? What crime has he committed and what should his punishment be? Why?
6. What do you think the morals of war are? What guidelines or criteria can someone use to live by in a war?
7. What impact do you think this might have on what people write and what they read?
8. Ultimately, this deals with the perceived power the woman had over the soldier (the possibility of killing him or his comrades). Is it right to kill someone because of the power they might eventually have over you?

Writing Assignment
Brutus justified killing Caesar by saying that he might become a dictator and deny citizens of Rome their freedom. Cassius believed this so strongly that he was willing to kill himself if the plot failed. When we discussed “The Soldier’s Dilemma” in class, we debated whether protecting the lives of American soldiers was worth murdering a person who might be innocent. Julius Caesar, “The Soldier’s Dilemma,” and real-life current events all deal with the same question: Does the threat a person or a country presents justify murdering people who might be innocent?
Your assignment is to consider this question and state your opinion in a well-developed essay. Your opinion MUST be backed up using specific examples from Julius Caesar. In your essay, you must state whether you believe Brutus was justified for murdering Caesar, or whether you believe that Brutus made the wrong decision. You may also use examples from “The Soldier’s Dilemma” and from the current events discussed in class. While the answer to this question is purely your opinion, your grade will be based on how well you support your position.

10 thoughts on “The Soldier’s Dilemma, Brutus, and Julius Caesar (for Global I)

  1. Well to tell you the truth im undecided because if he kills the woman which he dontt know her and she might have been innocent but then if he hold fire he is killing alot of his friends. But if I was in that position i think i would have killed the lady because which one would you rather lose a lady you don’t know or your friends that have your back.

  2. I think killing the lady would be best because she can bring harm to him and the troops.Even though she didn’t pose a threat she can be undercover and hurt someone once they let down their guard down. The negative thing about killing her is that she can be innocent and got killed for no reason. In the military they are trained to kill without hesitation so if he doesn’t shoot then his troops may feel as though he is a traitor. i highly agree with killing her.

  3. In my opinion, I think he should just shoot the woman. I say this because its better to kill one stranger, than to let that stranger kill more than one person that he knows and interacts with. That woman shouldn’t be around there anyway so it would be better if he just kills her because she might even die another way. He must follow rules. He most do what his superior told him to do.

  4. I’d say he should shoot the woman. Beter one person loose their life than a whole troop. Though some may argue that the woman on the road may too have family that depend on her, I can’t help but wonder why some one may be hiding outside when they know enemy soldiers may be around?The soldier must realize that the people has come to consider his family may soon be turned into bits. If one of them were in his shoes would he want them to play with his life? They are depending on him to keep them safe and their families back home are waiting for their loved ones to come back. Though its a hard choice I would not take the trust of all those lightly.

  5. I think it would be better to sacrifice one person, then to have a whole group of people die. In one way it wouldn’t be fair for the woman to die, but its her fault because she shouldn’t be in that place. Th soldier its only doing his job and following rules.

  6. Okay, let’s see I honestly have to agree with everyone, I think he should shoot the woman. I mean as harsh as it sound he doesn’t have an option, its either that or the life of his troops. But then again he might be killing an innocent woman that meant no harm to him or his troops. Mr. Piel this is really tough but that’s all i got!

  7. Interesting responses everyone. The reality is that in a wartime situation innocent people are at risk of being in the wrong place at the wrong time and paying the ultimate price. Back to Caesar, was it right that Caesar (as the proverbial woman) should die so that Rome (the company of soldiers) could survive as a free state? Remember, even though Caesar proclaimed himself dictator, was it still fair to say that he deserved to be assassinated? How does this affect our judgement of Brutus (as PFC Dillon)?

  8. There is no way I can see justifying shooting her. Dillon cannot be sure that the woman is a guerrilla, and could simply be scared for her safety. If the soldiers cannot see her, can she see them? Perhaps she can only hear the soldiers’ footsteps, and does not know who they are. One cannot say that she is even prohibited from being there, after all she is near her own village!

  9. just think of this the Nazis were just following orders , so should he? i mean i think she shouldn’t be shot, now what if that person was you would you rather be shot also. i mean life is precious. she shouldn’t be there yes but i think for the best out come lets say she isn’t innocent what if she was a Gorilla soldier would it be good to kill her then? i don’t think so, we should pity our enemies, not destroy them, so i think we shouldn’t kill her.

  10. Murder should not be used indiscriminately but it should be an option if a person poses a threat or causes harm to innocent people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *